Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Weird Al: Man, Myth, Legend

 

 

Ok, I feel all angsty and negative after my last post.  I need something to cheer my up, watching this video definitely helps.  As does this really awesome and in-depth piece about Weird Al Yankovic over at Wired.

 

I love Weird Al.  I think he's one of the true, eternal geek icons.  Long Live Weird Al.

Alan Moore Is A Crazy Bastard



 

I know that Alan Moore is seen by many people as one of (if not the) best comic book writers of all time.  His works include books like V For Vendetta, From Hell, League of Extraordinary Gentlemen and, of course, The Watchmen.  His writing has been described as groundbreaking and amazing and all sorts of other high praised adjectives.  However, there's one thing I always get annoyed by when I hear other comic fans discuss the "greatness" of Alan Moore.  No one ever mentions that he's absolutely crazy-go-nuts wacked out insane.

 

Take for example, his recent comments about the Watchmen movie that may or may not be coming out next year.  Moore has long detested hollywood.  He's made many negative remarks on the state of the film industry over the last two decades or so, and he was no different in a recent interview with the LA times.  When asked about the upcoming Watchmen movie, Moore had this to say:

 
"I find film in its modern form to be quite bullying," Moore told me during an hour-long phone call from his home in England. "It spoon-feeds us, which has the effect of watering down our collective cultural imagination. It is as if we are freshly hatched birds looking up with our mouths open waiting for Hollywood to feed us more regurgitated worms. The 'Watchmen' film sounds like more regurgitated worms. I for one am sick of worms. Can't we get something else? Perhaps some takeout? Even Chinese worms would be a nice change."

 

Regurgitated worms?  The supposedly greatest comic writer of all time couldn't come up with a better analogy than regurgitated worms? 

 

Now, I don't wish to be overly mean here.  I can definitely understand a person's hatred for Hollywood.  Sure, they make a lot of stupid crap movies and about 90% of the stuff that gets made is shit.  But it's really hard to listen to someone rant about hollywood and take them serious when in the same interview I read the following about them:

 
Moore sometimes wears metallic talons, describes himself as an anarchist and, in the past, has told interviewers that he worships an ancient Roman snake god.

 

I've seen him wearing the talons in pictures, and I've got no real problems with anarchists.  But worshiping an Ancient Roman Snake God?  Um...ok...sure.  Whatever.  And let's not forget the fact that more looks like the kinda guy who mails out letter bombs to people.  Seriously, if you were alone in a dark alley and Alan Moore walked into it, wouldn't you be a little scared too?

 

Another thing that really bugs me about Moore is his hypocrisy.  In the interview he both decries Hollywood while schilling his own DVD at the same time.

 
There is one film that Moore is supporting right now. It's the new DVD release entitled "The Mindscape of Alan Moore" and it's an artfully executed documentary that is built entirely around Moore sitting in his somewhat spooky living room and ruminating about art, storytelling, magic and culture.

 

Sure, you'll back Hollywood when it's a movie specifically about you.  But everything else you'll call regurgitated worms.  I'm sorry, but this level of hypocrisy and sense of self-importance Moore seems to have bugs the crap out of me.  Sure, you wrote some of the best comics ever.  But you also wrote your best work 20 years ago.  So can you please shut up now and let us enjoy ourselves as we see talented people adapt your works into other mediums?  And besides, what are you even doing nowadays?

 
Moore said he is now working on new installments in his marvelous comics series "League of Extraordinary Gentlemen," which is far more nuanced and daring than the forgettable film of the same title. The new stories take the narrative to the moon where there is a war underway between the giant insects (inspired by the H.G. Wells 1901 book "The First Men In The Moon") and nude lunar amazons.

 

A comic about a war on the moon between giant insects and nude lunar amazons?  Yeah, that sounds like a real masterpiece.  You have fun with that.

 

I will admit though that Moore did say one thing I totally agree with in this interview though.  He described how he sees the current state of the comic book industry, and god damned if the crazy guy isn't dead on.

 
"There are three or four companies now that exist for the sole purpose of creating not comics, but storyboards for films. It may be true that the only reason the comic book industry now exists is for this purpose, to create characters for movies, board games and other types of merchandise. Comics are just a sort of pumpkin patch growing franchises that might be profitable for the ailing movie industry."

 

I completely agree with this statement.  It really does seem to me that the larger comic companies like Marvel and DC now only exist to create properties for movie companies.  And smaller companies seem to be only making new comics that look and feel like they'll be easily adapted to a movie.  It's a sad state if you ask me. 

 

So I'll grant that Moore may be right about that one thing.  But I really do wish he'd shut up about the Watchmen movie.  Yes, you hate hollywood, we get it.  But you know what, we (your audience) don't care.  We love Hollywood.  You can call us brain dead masses all you want, but if it wasn't for us you wouldn't be able to afford your creepy living room in your house in England.  And I'm fairly certain you're going to make a vast amount of cash from this Watchmen movie.  So just sit there with your bags of cash and shut the fuck up and let us enjoy our movie.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

My New Blog



 

The starting up of this blog has gotten be bitten by the writing bug.  However, not everything I want to write about is geek news related, and so doesn't really fit on this site.  To accomodate my other writing desires, I've started up a personal blog.

 

If you care at all to read it, you can find it here.

 

I've also added a permanent link at the top of this page called Pat's Blog.  You can click there to find the blog's address if need be.

 

The posts there will be a bit more personal most likely.  They'll be filled with my random thoughts and observations as I go about my days.  So if you care to hear the random musings of a mad man, feel free check it out.  Or not.  Whatever.

 

(Image courtesy of blogcomics.net)

The New GeekRoundTable Podcast Is Up



 

The fine folks over at the GeekRoundRable have put up their latest podcast for your listening pleasure.  To listen to the podcast, just go here.

 

In this episode, the RoundTable gives their opinion on the movies Dark Knight, Wanted and Wall-E.

 

A discussion is also had regarding the Tim Burton Batman movies, and whether or not they were good.  Of particular interest to me was the point that was made how Batman Returns wasn't a Batman film, it was a Tim Burton film.  I have long held this view myself.  I loved the first Batman film Burton did in 1989.  But Batman Returns just didn't feel like a Batman film to me.  It never has.  It looks and feels more like Nightmare Before Christmas than it does a Batman Film.

 

What suprised me though was that no one on the podcast mentioned the single biggest sin Batman Returns committed though.  It the film, Batman kills a guy!!!  I'm not making this up.  Go back and watch the film.  Batman commits murder in it.

 

It happens during the scene when the clowns from the Red Triangle Gang are disturbing the Christmas Tree lighting.  Batman has this thing of dynamite he picked up from somewhere else when he comes across a really large clown guy.  Knowing he can't beat the guy up, Batman decides to punch him anyways.  The clown laughs but see's batman smiling.  Confused, he looks down and notices that Batman has stuck the dynamite into his pants, and the punch was only a distraction.  Batman then knocks the clown through a manhole and walks away as a big explosion erupts from the manhole.

 

I clearly remember seeing this for the first time in theaters and thinking, "What the fuck!?!?!  Batman doesn't kill people!!!"  That scene has never sat right with me, and I still cringe whenever I see it. 

 

There are many other reasons to dislike Batman Returns (i.e. mind controlled Penguins with candy colored rockets strapped to them), but that scene alone is enough for me to say that this isn't a Batman film.  It's Tim Burton's warped view of Batman.

Meet The New Megatron



 

Latino Review has posted up a bunch of pics of the new version of Megatron from next summer's Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, and I'm left with only one question.  What the fuck is wrong with Michael Bay?

 

Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with him?  Why does he feel this consistent need to make everything in his films exaggeratedly ridiculous?  Ok, I get that they wanted to do something different with Megatron in this movie.  In the last film they couldn't make him a gun, so they made him a jet, I understand that.  Now they've decided to make him a tank.  I actually understand that too.

 

First off, it's a nice nod to Galvatron, but I'm left wondering why in the hell Megatron in tank form looks so damned stupid.  All of the other transformers, when in vechicle modes, look like normal versions of whatever the hell they're supposed to be.  Optimus Prime is a normal looking truck.  He's not some super retarded robo-truck thing with spikes and armor and shit.  He doesn't look like a vechicle out of the Road Warrior movies.  He looks like a fucking truck.

 

Yet Megatron over here, is he a normal looking tank?  HELL NO!  He looks like something you'd see in the future sequences of the Terminator films.  He looks like something built by Skynet. 

 

Why can't Michael Bay just make him a normal fucking tank?  I just don't get it.

News That Makes Me Very, Very Sad



 

sfx.co.uk has a book review up of Doctor Who - The Writer's Tale.  The book is about Russel T. Davies, the writer and major creative force behind the new Doctor Who series.  In it, he discusses a bunch of stuff about being a writer, his work on Doctor Who, and a bunch of other stuff.

 

However, one sentence really caught my eye, and it made me sad.  It was this sentence right here:

 
Davies was asked to meet with George Lucas to discuss writing for the Star Wars TV series - he decided to decline.

 

The TV series they are discussing there isn't the Clone Wars animated series, it's the live action Star Wars TV series that comes out in 2010 or 2011.  Now there are two ways to really view this bit of news.  One is to be very very sad that Davies declined to write for the show.  This sadness stems from knowing that having him on the show would have made it a lot better than it would be without him.  His ability at writing great and entertaining scifi is nigh untouchable.  His decision not to take part in the show is very depressing because I would have loved to see what he written for it.

 

The other way to see this news is with hope.  Lucas asking Davies means that he's probably going around asking a bunch of other people to write for the show too.  And if he's talking to famous scifi writers like Davies, then I'm really curious who else he's talking to.  The implications here are that Lucas himself will not be writing the series and will be passing the reigns of the show to very talented scifi writers. 

 

This gives me a lot of hope that the live action Star Wars might actually be really good.

Some Details About The Dark Knight DVD Are Out



 

Blu-ray.com is reporting what are the first details that have been released about the forthcoming Dark Knight DVD set.  Unfortunately, no official release date has been set yet for the DVD, but we do know a little bit now about what special features will be on the 2 disc set.

 
In addition to the movie itself, the first disc will include the "Gotham Discovered: The Creation of a Scene" extra where Director Christopher Nolan and his collaborators unveil details on the planning of the movie, including stunt double work, how the filming in IMAX was done and information about the new Bat-suit, Bat-pod, etc.

 

The second disc will include the following documentaries: "Batman Technology: Gadgets and Tools" (in HD), "Batman Unmasked: The Psychology of the Dark Knight" and "The World of Batman Seen Through Real Life Psychotherapy" (in HD), 6 clips from the Gotham Cable Premier's newscast: "Tonight in Gotham", plus art galleries on the Joker's letters, conceptual art, posters, production stills, trailers, and TV spots.

 

The thing that sounds the most interesting to me is the "Batman Seen Through Real Life Psychotherapy" extra.  Did they actually get real PhD psychologists to discuss the emotionally messed up Bruce Wayne?  If so, that's hilarious.  Maybe I'm just a psych nerd (I do have a degree in Psychology afterall) but this sounds like it has the potential to be vastly entertaining.  Real life psychologists discussing the Joker and Batman and breaking down what their particular psychological disorders would be if they were real people.  You can't get any more entertaining than that as far as I'm concerned.

 

Also, it wasn't mentioned above, but I'm sure we'll see a slew of other extras, such as audio commentary tracks and subtitles and blah blah blah.  What we really want to know though is whether there are going to be any deleted scenes included with the set.  I'm dying to see more Joker scenes with Heath Ledger.

 

(Original link via IO9)